期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Advances in Higher Education Research. 2026; 1: (1) ; 21-24 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.aher.20260006.

Exploring AI-powered approaches to enhance curriculum design for university teachers
AI赋能的高校教师课程设计路径提升探索

作者: 王荣, 刘敏 *

南通理工学院健康医学院 江苏南通

*通讯作者: 刘敏,单位:南通理工学院健康医学院 江苏南通 ;

发布时间: 2026-06-03 总浏览量: 172

摘要

随着生成式人工智能(Generative Artificial Intelligence, GenAI)技术的爆发式增长,高等教育正经历着从数字化向智能化转型的关键时期。本文旨在系统综述AI赋能高校教师课程设计的理论逻辑、实施路径及潜在风险。AI不仅是提效的工具,更是重塑教育生态的催化剂,高校教师需主动重构课程设计思维,以适应人机共生的未来教育图景。

关键词: 生成式人工智能;课程设计;高等教育;个性化学习;教学评价

Abstract

With the explosive growth of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technology, higher education is undergoing a critical period of transformation from digitalization to intelligence. This article aims to systematically review the theoretical logic, implementation paths and potential risks of AI-enabled course design for university teachers. AI is not only a tool for enhancing efficiency but also a catalyst for reshaping the educational ecosystem. College teachers need to proactively restructure their course design thinking to adapt to the future educational landscape of human-machine symbiosis.

Key words: Generative Artificial Intelligence; Course design; Higher education; Personalized learning; Teaching evaluation

参考文献 References

[1] ZHAI X. Transforming teachers’ roles and agencies in the era of generative AI: Perceptions, acceptance, knowledge, and practices[J]. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2024:1–11.

[2] PURWONO P, MA’ARIF A, MARHOON H M, et al. Generative AI as a Pedagogical Co-Pilot in Higher Education: A Review of Adaptive Learning and Teacher Support Systems[J]. Journal of Technological Pedagogy and Educational Development, 2025, 2(1):28–42.

[3] NUALPRASERT B, PUNKHOOM W, JEHMA H. Reframing Digital Literacy in ELT: Integrating SAMR, AI-TPACK, and Connectivism in the Global South[J]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2025, 19(20).

[4] PARK J, CHOO S. Generative AI prompt engineering for educators: Practical strategies[J]. Journal of Special Education Technology, 2025, 40(3):411–417.

[5] ATCHLEY P, PANNELL H, WOFFORD K, et al. Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: opportunities and concerns[J]. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2024, 9(1):20.

[6] CHU T S, ASHRAF M. Artificial intelligence in curriculum design: A data-driven approach to higher education innovation[J]. Knowledge, 2025, 5(3):14.

[7] MATTAR J. Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning[J]. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 2018, 21(2).

[8] MENA-GUACAS A F, LóPEZ-CATALáN L, BERNAL-BRAVO C, et al. Educational transformation through emerging technologies: Critical review of scientific impact on learning[J]. Education Sciences, 2025, 15(3):368.

[9] FAJARDO-RAMOS D C, ANDRéS C, MELLA-NOREMBUENA J. Human-in-the-Loop Assessment with AI: Implications for Teacher Education in Ibero-American Universities[C]. Frontiers in Education, 2025:1710992.

[10] GONZALEZ-NUCAMENDI A, NOGUEZ J, NERI L, et al. Learning analytics to determine profile dimensions of students associated with their academic performance[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(20):10560.

[11] ABU-RASHEED H, DORNHöFER M, WEBER C, et al. Building contextual knowledge graphs for personalized learning recommendations using text mining and semantic graph completion[C]. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2023:36–40.

[12] CHEN P, LU Y, ZHENG V W, et al. Knowedu: A system to construct knowledge graph for education[J]. Ieee Access, 2018, 6:31553–31563.

[13] RUTECKA P, CICHA K, RIZUN M, et al. Generative AI in Curriculum Design: Empirical Insights Into Model Performance and Educational Constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2025.

[14] KIM H, KOO T K. The impact of generative AI on syllabus design and learning[J]. Journal of Marketing Education, 2024:02734753241299024.

[15] XHAKAJ F, ALEVEN V, MCLAREN B M. Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning[C]. European conference on technology enhanced learning, 2017:315–329.

[16] HASNINE M N, NGUYEN H T, TRAN T T T, et al. A real-time learning analytics dashboard for automatic detection of online learners’ affective states[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(9): 4243.

[17] MOLENAAR I, KNOOP-VAN CAMPEN C A. How teachers make dashboard information actionable[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2018, 12(3):347–355.

[18] BAKHARIA A, BURT J. Teaching with GenAI: A TPACK-Based Case Study in Web and Mobile Development Education[J]. Inquiry in Action: Using AI to Reimagine Learning and Teaching: Case Studies from the Frontline of Higher Education Practice, 2025.

[19] COMBéFIS S. Automated code assessment for education: review, classification and perspectives on techniques and tools[J]. Software, 2022, 1(1):3–30.

[20] WANG E L, MATSUMURA L C, LITMAN D, et al. Contributions to research on automated writing scoring and feedback systems. RAND Corporation. 

[21] CONIJN R, KAHR P, SNIJDERS C C. The effects of explanations in automated essay scoring systems on student trust and motivation[J]. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2023, 10(1):37–53.

引用本文

王荣, 刘敏, AI赋能的高校教师课程设计路径提升探索[J]. 高等教育研究进展, 2026; 1: (1) : 21-24.